Advancing Universal Midwifery Care - HEA00167I
Module will run
| Occurrence | Teaching period |
|---|---|
| A | Semester 1 2026-27 |
Module aims
Note: This document uses the word 'women’ throughout. This should be taken to include people who do not identify as women but are pregnant or who have given birth.
-
Advance a rigorous, evidence-based understanding of universal care for women and families during the childbearing period.
-
Critically analyse the midwife’s role providing universal care for women and families within the childbearing period, including:
-
public health, health promotion and health protection
-
assessment, screening and care planning
-
optimising normal physiological processes
-
working to promote positive outcomes and prevent complications.
-
Module learning outcomes
By the end of the module, students will be able to:
-
Analyse and evaluate the evidence base for universal care for women and families during the childbearing period.
-
Analyse and evaluate the midwife’s role providing universal care for women and families within the childbearing period, with a focus on:
-
public health, health promotion and health protection
-
assessment, screening and care planning
-
optimising normal physiological processes
-
working to promote positive outcomes and prevent complications.
-
-
Analyse and evaluate evidence aligned to the UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) topics mapped to this module.
-
Analyse and evaluate evidence, and implement ethical frameworks to support informed decision making, and to strengthen women’s capabilities to care for themselves and their newborn infants
Module content
Content includes: public health across the life course; health and social inequalities and their determinants; identification, analysis and interpretation of research evidence and local, national, and international data and reports; promoting and informing best midwifery policy and practice; vulnerability regarding physical, psychological, social, cultural, or spiritual circumstances; clinical skills (including simulation); supporting women’s evidence-informed decision-making; advocacy, leadership and escalation of concerns; ethical frameworks; rights based approaches; themes within UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) University Standards mapped to this module including applying theory to practice to support infant feeding choices; academic & library skills - accessing quality sources of data and statistics.
Please also see detailed mapping of this module content to NMC (2019) Standards of proficiency for midwives for the programme.
Indicative assessment
| Task | % of module mark |
|---|---|
| Oral presentation/seminar/exam | 100.0 |
Special assessment rules
Non-compensatable
Indicative reassessment
| Task | % of module mark |
|---|---|
| Oral presentation/seminar/exam | 100.0 |
Module feedback
Written feedback will be provided on the standard proforma within the timescale specified in the programme handbook.
Indicative reading
Bowden, J. and Basset, S. (Eds). (2025). Health promotion in midwifery: principles and practice. (4th ed). New York: Routledge.
Brown, A. (2021). Better births: the midwife 'with woman'. (1st ed). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Chandraharn, E. (2022). Physiological interpretation of CTG from knowledge to practice: Volume 1: responding to fetal hypoxic stress. Independently published.
Chatfield, T. (2020). Think critically. London: SAGE.
Clarke, E. (2015). Law and ethics for midwifery. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: effective analysis, argument and reflection. (3rd ed). London: Palgrave.
Crowther, S. & Hall, J. (Eds).(2017). Spirituality and childbirth. Abingdon: Routledge.
Davies, L. and Deery, R. (Eds). (2014). Nutrition in pregnancy and childbirth: food for thought. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hansard, N. (2020). Supporting survivors of sexual abuse through pregnancy and childbirth: A guide for midwives, doulas and other healthcare professionals. London: Singing Dragon
Hill, M. (2019). Give birth like a feminist. Your body. Your baby. Your choices. HQ.
Hubley, J., Copeman, J. and Woodall, J. (2021). Practical health promotion. (3rd ed). Medford MA: Polity Press.
Jones, S. R. (2020). Ethics in midwifery. (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Elsevier.
Musson, P. (2024). Values, ethics & rights for health and social care. (1st ed). St Albans: Critical Publishing.
NHS England. (2022). The equality and health inequalities hub. [Online]. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/about/equality/equality-hub/
Palmer, G. (2016). Why the politics of breastfeeding matter. London: Pinter & Martin.
Pereira, S. (2025). Is the fetus fit for labor?: a physiological approach to CTG interpretation. Independently published.
Pollard, M. (2018). Evidence-based care for breastfeeding mothers. (2nd ed). Abingdon: Routledge.
Squire, C. (Ed). (2017). The social context of birth. (3rd ed). London: Routledge.
UNICEF UK. (2025). UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative Theory of change. [Online]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfriendly/baby-friendly-launches-new-theory-of-change-framework/
Wardere, H. (2016). Cut: one woman’s fight against FGM in Britain today. London: Simon and Schuster
Watson, R. et al. (2024). Is the period of austerity in the UK associated with increased rates of adverse birth outcomes? European Journal of Public Health, 34(6), pp. 1043-1051.
Wickham, S. (2018). Inducing labour: Making informed decisions (2nd ed) Avebury: Birthmoon Creations.
Wickham, S. (2021). In your own time. How Western medicine controls the start of labour and why this needs to stop. Avebury: Birthmoon Creations.
Wills, J. (2022). Foundations for health promotion. (5th ed). London: SAGE.