Natural Sciences Extended Research Project - NAT00001M
Module summary
This module represents the climax of the entire MSci Natural Sciences programme. It brings together knowledge that has been accrued and skills that have been developed during the previous three years. The project is an open-ended investigation that generates new knowledge. (The applied methodology may itself be either mature or less well established.)
Module will run
| Occurrence | Teaching period |
|---|---|
| A | Semester 1 2025-26 to Semester 2 2025-26 |
Module aims
This module represents the climax of the entire MSci Natural Sciences programme. It brings together knowledge that has been accrued and skills that have been developed during the previous three years.
The project is an open-ended investigation that generates new knowledge. (The applied methodology may itself be either mature or less well established.)
Natural Sciences projects have interdisciplinary aspects that reflect the students’ individual pathways through the programme. Depending on the subject of the investigation, the project may be conducted in a group – for example constituted of Natural Scientists from different final subject areas. Even in the case of a group project, each student’s project will have distinct individual elements.
The aim of this module is to develop and demonstrate the ability to design, plan, carry out and report on an open-ended investigation that generates new knowledge.
A list of projects on offer for each academic year is made available during the Summer Term of the preceding academic year. Students submit an ordered list of their preferred projects and the Project Module Coordinator then assigns students to projects. Projects are offered on a variety of topics to suit students from all Natural Sciences pathways.
Further details are given by the Project Module Coordinator in the briefing session at the beginning of the Autumn Term.
Module learning outcomes
On conclusion of this module, a successful student will be able to:
- assess the risk and manage other safety-related aspects of the project
- retrieve, analyse, synthesise and evaluate relevant literature and other information relating to the project topic (journal articles, websites, textbooks, research group seminars)
- take a outline methodology from the project supervisor and develop it into a detailed project plan and timetable
- investigate an area of the Natural Sciences in a systematic way using appropriate experimental, observational and/or theoretical techniques
- work independently and organise effectively to achieve the project’s goals
- work effectively in group situations
- apply an agreed methodology to a new situation/scenario/regime in order to generate new knowledge
- report the project outcome and evaluate its success in a substantial word-processed report
- communicate the project’s motivation, objectives and results to a general audience by oral presentation
Indicative assessment
| Task | % of module mark |
|---|---|
| Essay/coursework | 70 |
| Oral presentation/seminar/exam | 20 |
| Oral presentation/seminar/exam | 10 |
Special assessment rules
None
Additional assessment information
The oral presentation to the peer group and staff is not re-assessable given that the assessment requires students to communicate the project's motivation, objectives and results to a general audience comprised of peers. As such, if this component of the module is failed and attains a mark below 40, there is no opportunity for reassessment. There is however, no requirement for students to pass every component of the module (including any non-reassessable elements) but rather to attain a cumulative mark of above or equal to 50%. Where a student has been awarded a marginal fail mark of 40- 49 for the dissertation element they will have an opportunity to make amendments which would enable a passing threshold to be reached. Only the dissertation component can be reassessed.
Indicative reassessment
| Task | % of module mark |
|---|---|
| Essay/coursework | 70 |
Module feedback
All (re)assessments are provided with written feedback (on standard proformas) within two weeks of the submission deadline.
Indicative reading
This is dependent on the project and will be directed by the project supervisor(s).