Assessment methods
Interviewing is the most common selection method, but on its own it may not be a reliable indicator of job performance.
Include additional tests or exercises to assess candidates against elements of the job that may be difficult to judge in an interview, such as:
- Academic, research or teaching posts: You could ask candidates to deliver a seminar, give a departmental presentation or write a report.
- Facilities support posts: A practical test could be used to test an individual's skills, eg for a security post candidates could be asked to watch a video of an incident and write an incident report.
- Administrative posts: You could ask candidates to complete an exercise using office software, or do an in-tray exercise.
- Technical posts: Candidates could be asked to diagnose faults on equipment and suggest possible methods of fixing them.
- Posts involving finance: Candidates could be asked to interpret financial information or to complete a numeracy skills test.
- Posts requiring supervisory skills: You could ask candidates to take part in a supervisory role-play.
Maintaining fairness
Although additional tests can be very useful, you must make sure they are carried out in a fair, inclusive and consistent manner to avoid disadvantaging any candidates.
Bear these principles in mind when designing, implementing and assessing tests:
- Give all candidates plenty of prior warning.
- Explain to them the purpose and duration of the test and give clear instructions.
- Have a clear understanding of what you are testing for.
- Rather than making vague or subjective notes during the tests, develop a set of objective criteria that you will mark against.
- All tests should be administered uniformly; in the same location, by the same person, with the same resources and time limits.
- The tests must be designed to provide equality of opportunity for all candidates.
- You should be prepared to make adaptations for candidates with a disability.