Use of the Mental Health Act to detain people in hospital has become an overused last resort
Posted on Thursday 27 February 2020
According to the research by the University of York, factors including overstretched mental health services and a deterioration in social structures are leading to increasing numbers of people being detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act.
The findings are based on interviews and a national survey with Approved Mental Health Professionals (AMHPs) – the professional group, predominantly comprised of social workers, who carry out assessments under the Mental Health Act to determine whether someone requires compulsory hospital admission.
Experience
In a series of interviews and a national online survey, AMHPs were asked to draw on their experience in administering the Mental Health Act to consider why they feel detentions are rising and what they believe could be done to reverse the trend.
In considering why the number of people admitted to hospital against their will is increasing, AMHPs cited:
- A significant increase in demand for mental health services which has vastly outstripped supply
- An increase in the social stresses faced by people – such as difficulty accessing benefits and problems associated with housing, addiction and social isolation – which is felt to be having a considerable negative impact on the mental health of the population.
- A reduction in the effectiveness of hospital admissions to support people during mental health crises. This was felt to be due in part, to an increase in psychiatric wards discharging patients prematurely due to pressure on a finite number of inpatient beds.
The study found the majority of AMHPs recognised and were worried about the trend of increasing detentions under the Mental Health Act, and agreed that the Government was right to try and do something about it. However, whilst AMHP’s supported the intention, they generally disagreed with the Government’s approach of suggesting changes to legislation as the means of addressing this issue.
Mental health crises
The Government commissioned an Independent Review into uses of the Mental Health Act last year and made a number of recommendations for changes to mental health policy and practice. However, AMHPs in the study advocated instead for investment in resources such as preventative services which promote greater social inclusion and interaction to help reduce the number of people experiencing mental health crises. They also recommended changes to acute services such as increasing the numbers of non-medical and crisis houses, to offer an alternative to hospital admission for those in crisis.
Study author, Michael Bonnet, graduate from the Department of Social Policy and Social Work said: “Our respondents in the study viewed the problem of rising detention rates as symptomatic of a bigger issue: an unprecedented and unsustainable demand for mental health services, caused in part by a deterioration in the social structures that help people to stay well, leaving services perilously stretched at precisely the point they are most needed.
“Our research concluded that, within this context, use of the Mental Health Act has become an overused last resort, not by design, but by necessity.”
Compulsory admissions
Michael – who is a social worker – graduated from the Think Ahead Programme, which is run in partnership with the University of York’s Department of Social Policy and Social Work.
Co-author Dr Nicola Moran from the Department of Social Policy and Social Work said: “What makes this study interesting is that Approved Mental Health Professionals (AMHPs) are the professional group responsible for determining whether someone requires compulsory admission to hospital. Despite this fact, previous research has failed to seek their views, instead focusing on psychiatrists’ views.”
A new report out by the Care Quality Commission last month showed that the use of the Mental Health Act continues to rise with around 50,000 detentions to psychiatric hospitals made under the Act last year.
