Posted on 24 October 2011

A recent study by York Management School staff examines the link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate control. Corporations are often accused of developing cosmetic CSR programmes that lack genuine substance. By focusing on the issue of control of key assets, this research shows that CSR programmes can have positive and negative content. CSR initiatives such as employee housing, training and welfare can have positive effects for staff welfare, and at the same time extend corporate control over significant aspects of their lives. Conversely, where a CSR policy might threaten such control, for example employee participation, it is more likely to be strongly curtailed. Genuine transfers of power that might arise as a result of CSR initiatives are viewed negatively by corporate management. In a leading example, the refusal of British Petroleum (The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company) to involve Iranians in all but the lowest levels of the organisational hierarchy resulted in the nationalisation of the company’s assets by the Iranian government in 1951.
Details of the work can be found in 'Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Control: The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, 1933-1951' by Neveen Abdelrehim, Josephine Maltby and Steven Toms which appeared online in Enterprise and Society in July 2011 and will be published in Spring 2012.