Skip to content Accessibility statement
York Graduate Research School
HomeResearchYork Graduate Research SchoolPolicy, forms and documentsPolicy on Research Degrees5. Supervision

5. Supervision

5.1 Supervisors play a fundamental role in supporting PGRs throughout their studies. The University recognises, however, that the exact nature of the supervisory process will vary depending on the academic discipline and associated research environment.

5.2 Supervisors are bound by the Statement on Research Performance Expectations and the Personal Relationships Policy. 

Appointment of supervisors

5.3 Supervisors are appointed by the Head of Department (or their delegate), in consultation with the Graduate Chair. 

5.4 The academic judgement as to whether any supervisory arrangement (eg number of supervisors, the fit between a supervisor's area of research and that of their supervisee etc.) is adequate for the PGR’s research project ultimately rests with the Graduate School Board.

5.5 Each PGR must have a designated main supervisor who is their first point of contact (this applies even if supervisors consider themselves to be joint supervisors).

5.6 Departments are encouraged, where practicable, to appoint a supervisory team i.e. to appoint one or more co-supervisors in addition to the main supervisor. A co-supervisor:

a. must be appointed when the main supervisor is inexperienced (see below)
b. should normally be appointed, from a different disciplinary perspective, when research is highly interdisciplinary
c. should normally be appointed, from the partner department, when research is being conducted across departments
d. will often be appointed, from an external partner, when research is being conducted across institutions, or is based in industry (or other non-academic partner) or professional practice
e. may be appointed to bring particular knowledge, skill or experience to a supervisory team and/or to serve a particular role e.g. to provide pastoral support.   

5.7 The main supervisor and/or supervisory team must have an appropriate level of expertise to supervise the research being undertaken by their supervisee. This does not necessarily require the supervisor(s) to be experts in their supervisee's specific topic of research. 

5.8 The ability of supervisors to meet their supervisory responsibilities should not be put at risk as a result of an excessive volume or range of other responsibilities.

5.9 Departments should, if possible, avoid appointing a main and co-supervisor who are in a close personal relationship. Staff who are registered for a standard PhD (not a PhD by Published Work) should not supervise other PGRs as this presents a conflict of interest between being a supervisor and a PGR peer.

5.10 Where there is a change of supervisor (see below) or change of supervisory role (eg from main to co-supervisor, see below) all parties need to agree and record in SkillsForge how the change will work in practice (eg clear expectations around participation in supervisory meetings).

Eligibility to serve as a main supervisor

5.11 The main supervisor must be a member of the University’s Academic or Research staff (ie on a Teaching and Research, or Research, contract) (including probationary staff) at a minimum of grade 7 (lecturer/research fellow) and on a permanent contract or a fixed-term contract that extends beyond the expected completion date of the PGR’s programme (and who has not committed to leave the University’s employment before the PGR’s expected completion date). Where appropriate, the Head of Department may appoint as a main supervisor a member of Teaching staff (ie on a Teaching and Scholarship contract - note that any papers co-authored between a PGR and a member of Teaching staff may not be REF-able, seek up to date advice from PIP) or a member of Academic, Research or Teaching staff at grade 6 (associate lecturer equivalent). 

5.12 The expectation is that most staff who meet the criteria to serve as a main supervisor will have a PhD. There are, however, instances, particularly in disciplines where academics are frequently drawn from practice, where a member of staff meets the criteria to serve as a main supervisor but does not have a PhD. In such instances, it is for the department (as above) to decide if the appointment is suitable, in consultation with the PGR Faculty Lead if required. In such cases, a co-supervisor who has a PhD should normally be appointed.

5.13 If a main supervisor retires, they may continue as a co-supervisor for any current supervisees if: (i) a new main supervisor is appointed, and (ii) the retiree holds an emeritus/honorary appointment and their expertise remains valid. If a main supervisor moves to another institution, they may continue as a co-supervisor for any current supervisees if a new main supervisor is appointed.

Co-supervision

5.14 The following are eligible to serve as co-supervisors but not as main supervisors: research fellows (who do not meet the requirements to serve as a main supervisor), emeritus and honorary academic staff at the University of York; academic staff based in other academic institutions; researchers based in industry (or other non-academic partners) or professional practice.

5.15 Co-supervision may involve two or more supervisors having near-equal responsibility for a PGR (often called joint co-supervision) or an unequal split of responsibilities (eg where the subsidiary co-supervisor oversees a PGR's professional development, or a particular aspect of their project). 

5.16 The respective roles and responsibilities of members of a supervisory team (eg attendance at supervisory meetings, information-sharing, giving feedback on the PGR's work) and the PGR should be discussed and agreed at the outset. Decisions should be reviewed, and if necessary revised, over time. All decisions should be recorded in SkillsForge. Departments may find it helpful to have a document to guide the discussion and agreement process.

Assistant supervisors

5.17 Assistant supervisors may be appointed in accordance with the University's York Assistant Research Supervisor Scheme (YARSS).

Professional development for supervisors

5.18 The University has a duty of care to its PGRs, to ensure that they are provided with supervision that meets their needs, and to its supervisors, to ensure that they are prepared for this challenging role. The University discharges this duty of care through its expectation for supervisors to undertake professional development, in the form of supported experiential learning and a mandatory online tutorial. Those with less supervisory experience have more extensive professional development requirements and also serve an informal ‘supervisory probation’ period until they have supported - as a main supervisor - a York PhD PGR through to successful completion.

5.19 Departments should ensure that staff who are new to an academic career are given opportunities to gain experience of the supervisory process through serving on Thesis Advisory Panels and as co-supervisors. Postdocs are encouraged to train as a PGR mentor on the University PGR Mentoring Scheme. 

5.20 For the purpose of the professional development section of this policy ONLY (ie separate rules apply to the requirement around the mentoring of inexperienced supervisors), a supervisor may be defined as a ‘new supervisor’ if they have not - as a main supervisor - overseen a PhD PGR through to successful completion at any institution within the UK/Ireland; a ‘supervisor new to York’ if they have not - as a main supervisor - overseen a PhD PGR through to successful completion at the University of York but have done so at another institution within the UK/Ireland; or an ‘experienced supervisor’ if they have - as a main supervisor - overseen at least one PhD PGR through to successful completion at the University of York. 

5.21 New supervisors (whether serving in a main or co-supervisor role) are required to undertake professional development as follows:

  • Mandatory completion of the Becoming an Effective Research Supervisor (BERST) online tutorial before starting to supervise, with a refresher every three years AND
  • Expected participation in at least one PGR supervisor workshop offered by Research Culture & Researcher Development or suitable alternative (supervisors may wish to seek advice from their Graduate Chair about the appropriateness of any session) before starting to supervise, and every year thereafter until they have supervised a PhD PGR through to successful completion as a main supervisor AND
  • Strongly recommended participation in a PGR supervisory community of practice (CoP) and/or a departmental PGR supervisor mentoring scheme (as a mentee) until they have supervised a PhD PGR through to successful completion as a main supervisor.  

5.22 Supervisors new to York (whether serving in a main or co-supervisor role) are required to undertake professional development as follows:

  • Mandatory completion of the BERST online tutorial before starting to supervise at the University of York, with a refresher every three years AND
  • Expected participation in at least one of the following, at least once every three years: ie a PGR supervisor workshop offered by Research Culture & Researcher Development or suitable alternative (supervisors may wish to seek advice from their Graduate Chair about the appropriateness of any session); ii. a PGR supervisory Community of Practice shared practice meeting; iii. a departmental PGR supervisor mentoring scheme (as a mentee or mentor). 

5.23 Experienced supervisors (whether serving in a main or co-supervisor role) are required to undertake professional development as follows:

  • Mandatory completion of the BERST online tutorial, with a refresher every three years AND
  • Expected participation in at least one of the following, at least once every three years: ie a PGR supervisor workshop offered by Research Culture & Researcher Development (or suitable alternative); ii. a PGR supervisory Community of Practice shared practice meeting; iii. a departmental PGR supervisor mentoring scheme (as a mentor). 

5.24 Departments should monitor the completion of mandatory and expected professional development activities by supervisors. If a supervisor does not complete a mandatory professional development activity, the Graduate Chair should intervene and if necessary refer the matter to the Head of Department for action with reference to the Statement of Research Performance Expectations. If a supervisor does not complete an expected professional development activity this should be addressed through the performance review process.

5.25 Supervisors external to the University of York based in industry or similar are encouraged to complete the BERST online tutorial, with a refresher every three years. Supervisors external to the University of York based in other academic institutions are encouraged - or, depending on the nature of the arrangement , may be required - to complete the BERST online tutorial, with a refresher every three years. Completion - where required - should be overseen by the York supervisor, with any issues being referred to the Graduate Chair. 

Mentoring of inexperienced supervisors

5.26 A main supervisor who has not yet overseen - as a main or joint co-supervisor - a PGR through to successful completion of a PGR programme at the same or higher level* must be supported by an experienced co-supervisor. (*Eg an individual who has - as a main or joint co-supervisor - overseen the successful completion of an MSc (by research) PGR would still require an experienced co-supervisor when supervising a PhD PGR but not when supervising additional MSc (by research) PGRs.)

5.27 The purpose of the experienced co-supervisor is to serve as an advisor/mentor to the inexperienced supervisor and provide additional supervisory support to the PGR. The experienced co-supervisor should be a member of University staff (as set out above) and have a track record of successful PhD supervision.

5.28 The co-supervision model should be agreed, on a case by case basis, between the main supervisor, the experienced co-supervisor and the Graduate Chair, taking into account the development needs of the inexperienced supervisor and the supervisory needs of the PGR. The co-supervision model should be constant for an individual PGR to avoid disrupting their experience but may vary between individual PGRs as, over time, the inexperienced supervisor develops their supervisory practice and confidence. The experienced co-supervisor must attend TAP meetings and contribute to the supervisor’s report for formal reviews of progress. 

Supervisory meetings

5.29 A supervisory meeting is any meeting between a PGR and a supervisor where the supervisor undertakes their supervisory responsibilities: providing advice and support to help the PGR complete their research project on time and to an appropriate standard, and develop their professional and personal skills.

5.30 Regular supervisory meetings are essential to establish and maintain an effective supervisor-PGR relationship. PGRs and supervisors are jointly responsible for ensuring that regular supervisory meetings take place and that the University’s requirements for formal supervisory meetings (see below) are met.

Formal supervisory meetings 

5.31 For a supervisory meeting to count as a formal supervisory meeting, it must be of sufficient duration to allow for substantive discussion of, and feedback on, research progress and plans and/or, where relevant, training and development needs. Formal supervisory meetings must also be recorded appropriately (see below) and individual to a PGR (not a group supervision). 

5.32 A full-time PGR in their normal period of enrolment must have a formal supervisory meeting at least every 6-7 weeks throughout the entire academic year: this equates to a minimum of eight formal supervision meetings per enrolment year.

5.33 Formal supervisory meetings for part-time PGRs are on a pro-rata basis (ie a PGR who is 0.5 fte must have a formal supervisory meeting at least every 12-14 weeks and a minimum of four formal supervisory meetings per enrolment year; for PGRs entering from the start of semester 1 2026). Part-time PGRS and their supervisors are advised to schedule an informal catch up between each formal supervisor meeting.  

5.34 The requirement for formal supervisory meetings may be temporarily waived by the relevant Graduate Chair only if a PGR is absent on academic grounds and unable (eg due to fieldwork location) to participate in a supervisory meeting by alternative means, normally video-conferencing. 

5.35 Formal supervisory meetings should be held in-person on-campus. Exceptions apply for PGRs on distance learning programmes, for PGRs on collaborative programmes that require residence away from York, for PGRs undertaking approved academic business away from York (for example, for data collection, placement or mobility period) and for supervisors undertaking academic business away from York. Where an exception applies, supervision should be via video-conferencing. Additional restrictions apply to PGRs on Student Visas (see section 7). 

5.36 The PGR should make a record (date, summary of discussion, agreed actions points) of each formal supervisory meeting on SkillsForge for approval by the supervisor(s). 

5.37 YGRS monitors formal supervisory meetings to ensure that they are happening on time and are correctly recorded. YGRS may require departments with a low rate of compliance to take action.

Other supervisory meetings

5.38 The nature and frequency of other (non-formal) supervisory meetings will vary by discipline and department: departmental expectations should be set out in PGR handbooks and at induction. For example, some laboratory-based PGRs may see their supervisor on a weekly basis but for short periods and sometimes as part of a group of PGRs, whereas in some arts and humanities departments, the expectation may be that supervisory contact between formal supervisory meetings is limited. The nature and frequency of other (non-formal) supervisory meetings may also vary depending on the stage and needs of an individual PGR. 

5.39 Any PGR or supervisor can request a supervisory meeting if they believe it is necessary and all parties should endeavour to ensure that the meeting happens as soon as possible.  

Supervision after the normal period of enrolment has ended

5.40 Formal supervisory meetings must continue as normal during a continuation period or extension to submission deadline for PGRs who are Student Visa holders (see the University’s Student Academic Engagement and Wellbeing Policy). For other PGRs, who are not Student Visa Holders, supervision meetings should continue on a regular basis at a frequency determined by the supervisor(s) in consultation with the Graduate Chair: these meetings should be recorded in SkillsForge. 

5.41 PGRs who receive a revise and resubmit outcome should work with their supervisor(s), and where appropriate their Graduate Chairs, to agree an appropriate pattern of supervision. Student Visa holders must meet the supervision requirements set out in the University’s Student Academic Engagement and Wellbeing Policy.

Providing feedback on, and dealing with challenges to, the supervisory relationship (can also be applied to challenges with the TAP)

5.42 Sometimes the relationship between a PGR and a supervisor can become strained or, in rare cases, break down. Where a supervisory relationship is not working as well as it might, the PGR and the supervisor are encouraged, in the first instance, to discuss the issue together and attempt to find a resolution. If the PGR feels unable to discuss the issue directly with the supervisor, or the issue remains unresolved having done this, or a discussion would be inappropriate, there are a number of options: (i) review of supervision, (ii) request to change supervisor, (iii) raise a complaint. PGRs are reminded that if they have a supervisory issue but do not raise it, action cannot be taken to resolve it. 

5.43 Whatever the issue, and whatever option a PGR wishes to pursue, the students’ union can provide independent advice and support.

Review of Supervision 

5.44 PGRs should feel free to talk confidentially about a supervisory issue with another member of their Thesis Advisory Panel (TAP), the Graduate Chair (or their alternate), or other departmental officer (as set out in the department’s PGR handbook). 

5.45 Towards the end of each TAP meeting (see section 8), the Independent Panel Member should encourage the PGR to complete and submit the Review of Supervision form, thereby offering the PGR an opportunity to discuss their supervisory relationship in a safe environment. The Review of Supervision form can also be completed independently of the TAP process. Review of Supervision forms are triaged by the department's Graduate Administrator and, where appropriate, sent to the Graduate Chair (or their alternate where the Graduate Chair is the PGR’s supervisor) for action.

5.46 If a PGR feels unable to flag their concerns within their department (directly or via the Review of Supervision form) they can arrange to speak in confidence to one of the Faculty PGR leads.

5.47 When a supervisory issue is raised with a member of staff (directly or via the Review of Supervision form), they will advise the PGR of possible solutions. Some issues may be easily resolved, others may involve an offer of a facilitated discussion between the PGR and the supervisor and/or their department.

5.48 PGRs should be reassured that if they raise a supervisory issue in confidence (including via the Review of Supervision form) that it will not be disclosed to the supervisor concerned without the PGR’s explicit written consent, although this may limit the options available for action. Options for action that do not require supervisory disclosure may include interventions that do not target an individual supervisor (eg changing departmental policy or providing training for all departmental supervisors) or direct support to the affected PGR (eg training to help them address the situation and/or signposting to University or students' union advice and support services). 

Requesting a change of supervisor

5.49 A PGR can make a request to their department to change supervisor. PGRs may give a reason for their request or make the request on a ‘no blame’ basis. Departments should endeavour to fulfil reasonable requests (note that this extends only to the request to change, not the choice of the replacement supervisor). If a department does not believe there are any ground for a change of supervisor (or that a request is frivolous or vexatious), the case should be referred to the PGR Faculty Lead for arbitration (or the PGR Faculty Lead for another faculty if the PGR is in the Faculty Lead's department).

5.50 Occasionally, a PGR may request a change of supervisor but this is not possible due to unresolvable expertise or funder/sponsor issues [note that funder/sponsor issues should almost always be resolvable when the funding is from or paid via the University]. In this case, other options should be explored: for example, a department might appoint a new main supervisor and retain the existing supervisor as a co-supervisor (perhaps where that individual has knowledge vital for oversight of the PGR’s research project) or appoint additional co-supervisors.

Absence and replacement of a supervisor

5.51 A change of main supervisor - for any reason -  has implications for PGRs who require ATAS clearance and affected departments must contact the Student Visa Compliance Team.

5.52 PGRs should be informed who would be their first point of contact if their main supervisor were to be temporarily unavailable. This would normally be the co-supervisor, if one has been appointed, or, if not, another member of their Thesis Advisory Panel.

5.53 Heads of Departments should liaise with Graduate Chairs regarding forthcoming resignations from the University, or any likelihood of prolonged absence e.g. for personal reasons, of members of staff with supervisory responsibility for PGRs. Departments should, as soon as practicable, inform PGRs formally in writing if a supervisor resigns or has to step aside, giving information on the arrangements for continued supervision.

5.54 In the event of a main supervisor becoming unable to continue supervising a PGR on a permanent or long-term basis, a replacement supervisor should be appointed, after consultation with the PGR, within one month of the main supervisor becoming unavailable. In the meantime, the designated person (see above) should assume the role of the absent supervisor. Appropriate arrangements should also be made where co-supervisors become unable to continue supervising a PGR on a permanent or long-term basis. 

5.55  If a PhD PGR’s research project, as agreed by the department on entry, is dependent on the academic expertise of a single, specialist member of academic staff, the department should consider what steps it might need to take to ensure continuity of supervision if that individual were to leave the University within the PGR's normal period of enrolment. If the supervisor does leave, the department must ensure that the PGR has appropriate academic support to enable them to successfully complete their PhD. A range of options may be appropriate, including team supervision, appointing the previous supervisor as a co-supervisor, supporting the PGR’s transfer to another institution (see section 7), or, rarely, appointing a specialist co-supervisor from another institution (paid for by the department if necessary).

5.56 If a PGR wishes to change their research project substantially (and where applicable, this change has been approved by funder/sponsor) such that their allocated supervisor(s) is(are) no longer able to supervise this research, the department should endeavour to find an alternate supervisor(s) in the new research area (either from within the department or another department within the University - the latter may be subject to a transfer of resources to the other department). If that is not possible then the University will not be bound to provide alternative external supervision and the PGR will be advised to transfer to another institution. 

If a supervisor has concerns about a supervisory relationship

5.57 If a supervisor believes that their supervisory relationship with their PGR is not functioning as it should, they should attempt to resolve the matter informally in the first instance. If they feel unable to discuss the issue directly with their PGR, or the issue remains unresolved having done this, then they should raise the matter with their Graduate Chair (or alternate). As a last resort - if the supervisory relationship has broken down irretrievably - a supervisor can - in consultation with their Graduate Chair - resign their position (without needing to give reasons) and then the department should appointment a new supervisor for the PGR as it would under any other circumstances where a supervisor needs to be replaced.