Accessibility statement

10. Evaluation of PGR programmes


Departments must have in place appropriate mechanisms for: (i) PGRs and recent graduates, and their supervisors to evaluate their experience, (ii) monitoring TAP and progression reports, and (iii) reviewing examiners’ reports. Departments may wish to consider whether feedback might usefully be requested from other interested parties eg sponsors, PGR administrators, alumni, employers and collaborating organisations. 


Departments also receive feedback from PGR representatives. Each department must ensure that there is at least one PGR on its Graduate School Board (or equivalent). 


Graduate School Boards should consider relevant PGR data (including PRES data, submission and completion data etc.) and ensure that any issues raised are dealt with appropriately. 


When undertaking reviews of its provision, a department should ensure that PGRs and their programmes are fully covered and, where relevant, issues are flagged for consideration by PPPC.


YGRS will ensure that the institution’s academic review processes pay due attention to PGRs and their programmes. The GSA represents PGRs on relevant University committees.