Skip to content Accessibility statement

Calls for more research to test the accuracy of low-cost air pollution monitors

News

Posted on Thursday 7 July 2016

The increasing popularity of low-cost air pollution monitors with members of the public could generate large volumes of untested and questionable data, two leading atmospheric scientists from the University of York have warned.
Credit: David Holt
Air pollution over London

Professor Alastair Lewis and Dr Peter Edwards call on researchers to test the accuracy of low-cost monitoring devices before regulators are flooded with questionable air quality measurements.

The public is increasingly aware of the health and economic costs of air pollution. Poor air quality is linked to over three million deaths each year, and 96 per cent of people in large cities are exposed to pollutant levels that are above recommended limits.

The costs of urban air pollution amount to two per cent of gross domestic product in developed countries and five per cent in developing countries.

Media attention and the increasing availability of data are reinvigorating efforts in many countries to tackle air pollution, driven as much by local and national politics as by science.

For regulatory purposes, governments and scientists use the most accurate, but expensive, detectors.

And although the interpretation of the data is a subject of lively debate, the quality of readings is rarely questioned. By contrast, few of these low-cost devices have been rigorously tested.

Writing a comment piece in the journal Nature, the academics say: “The research and regulatory communities are behind the curve.

“The penetration of these devices into the public domain, generating large volumes of untested and questionable data available to all, is inevitable and will increasingly become a headache for those who are responsible for managing air quality.

“Although we do not wish to stifle innovation, sensors that claim to be able to measure ambient pollution levels could be required to undergo an independent testing regime, as is the case for instruments that are used in regulatory measurements.

“The academic air pollution community must engage to ensure that it does the hard yards in the lab and field on calibration and testing.

“It must also find ways to overcome some measurement challenges. Researchers should take the lead on evaluating sensor performance, creating better devices and designing research applications that are suited to the quantified capabilities of sensors.”

Alastair Lewis  is Professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of York. Dr Pete Edwards is a research fellow in the Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories at the University of York.

 

Further information

Research newsletter

Our monthly research newsletter features a curated mix of news, events, and recent discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Explore more news

News

3 July 2026

Bears often get a bad reputation, but a new study shows that they might not be the species most often involved in human-wildlife interaction that can lead to conflicts in national parks.

News

1 July 2026

Predicting whether a company's profits will rise or fall has long been one of the most notoriously difficult tasks in finance. Corporate earnings underpin trillions of dollars in market valuation, yet traditional forecasting models are routinely upended by economic shocks, shifting consumer tastes, and unexpected corporate crises.

News

25 June 2026

The Scottish Child Payment (SCP) is successfully reducing child poverty and food insecurity, according to a new major study, featuring researchers from the University of York.

News

25 June 2026

Technological developments could change how artists connect with fans, following a trial of a virtual live performance held across two different counties.

News

24 June 2026

A study has revealed that despite centuries of violent regime changes, medieval Sicily was a genetic ‘melting pot’, where Christians and Muslims thrived together.

Read more news