Contemporary democratic societies are characterized by pluralism. Pluralism can be seen as an enriching and essential component of a genuine liberal democracy. Often, however, pluralism is (rightly or wrongly) perceived as a threat to democratic, liberal and egalitarian values. In contemporary political thinking, different concepts, such a toleration and recognition, have been used to confront challenges of pluralism. Is the concept of “toleration” enough to address the demands of pluralist societies or these demands call for “recognition” of, say, cultural and religious difference? And, when it comes to dealing with undemocratic, illiberal and inegalitarian values and political ideologies, can the concepts of toleration and recognition be useful at all? In other words, should we recognise or even tolerate what seems to be intolerable?
In this module, we will address these question and discuss which responses should be given to the challenges that different kinds of pluralism posit. We will do so by focusing on some pressing issues of pluralism, such as problems of religious accommodation, multicultural difference, same-sex marriage, freedom of speech, far-right politics and migration. Moreover, we will explore how the very ideas of “toleration” and “recognition” are vehemently contested by some not only as inadequate responses to the challenges of pluralism but also as tools of domination and “colonization”.
Every year our students' feedback helps us to improve our modules
“The variety of cases and theories discussed in the seminars helped students to develop an understanding of the topics.’