Accessibility statement

SCIMITAR-SA PhD Programme 2024

Step-by-step guide to the application process

1. Application timeline

Date Action
Feb/March 2024 Applications open
30 April 2024 Applications close
May 2024 Shortlisted applicants are notified of the interview process
June 2024 Interviews to take place
TBS at the time of offer Deadline for applicants to accept the offer
September 2024 The new academic year starts

2. Eligibility criteria

  • Applicants must be nationals of Bangladesh, India or Pakistan, who are interested in working in the area of physical and mental health in South Asian populations. They can choose to be based in York or their home country. 
  • At least an upper second-class honours (2:1) degree or equivalent in a health/medical sciences-related subject
  • A Masters degree in a health/medical sciences-related subject is highly desirable, or equivalent research experience in a relevant subject
  • English language proficiency demonstrated by one of the following tests (required for overseas applicants only):
    • IELTS: 7.0, with no less than 6.5 in each component
    • PTE Academic: 67, with no less than 61 in each component
    • CAE and CPE: (from January 2015) 185, with no less than 176 in each component
    • TOEFL: 96, with no less than 23 in each component
    • Trinity: Level 3, with 'Distinction' in each component
    • Duolingo: 130, minimum 120 in all components
3. Identify a research topic

The SCIMITAR-SA programme aims to address tobacco use among people with SMI (primarily schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, bipolar illness, and severe depression with psychosis) living in three South Asian countries – Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. Research teams will use the full range of research methods including evidence synthesis, qualitative research, clinical trials, economic evaluations and implementation science. 

Your research proposal should complement SCIMITAR-SA aims, and align with your interests, academic strengths and career aspirations. 

4. Identify a potential supervisor

All prospective applicants to the SCIMITAR-SA scholarship scheme are expected to have made contact with a potential supervisor, to help them guide the choice of research topic and support proposal development for the application. 

A list of potential academic supervisors who have indicated an interest in supporting students can be accessed here and their profiles and academic interests can be found on their respective university webpages. Once you have identified a suitable and willing supervisor, then you can work to refine your proposal. (Please note that if a supervisor agrees to support your application, it does not automatically identify them as your PhD supervisor, this will be finalised once successful candidates have been identified) 

You can also make an informal enquiry, either directly to the academic you are interested in working with from the list above, or with one of the PhD programme leads: Professor Simon Gilbody (simon.gilbody@york.ac.uk) or Dr. Faraz Siddiqui (faraz.siddiqui@york.ac.uk) Please include information about your strengths and areas of research interest. 

5. Prepare your application

  • Your application is likely to take at least several weeks to prepare - so start early.
  • You can download a pdf of the questions  in the online application form and write each section in advance before you start pasting them into the live application form.
  • Remember to keep saving your application form.
  • There are four main sections to the application form (and strict character limits): 
    • Personal information and eligibility; 
    • Outline of the proposed research topic;
    • Personal statement outlining your aspirations and ambitions; 
    • CV evidencing your academic, work and other relevant skills and experience.
  • In making your application, you will need the following documents:
    • Academic transcript/s from previous institution/s.  
    • Research proposal. 
    • Personal statement. 
    • CV.

Guidance on what to include in the research proposal, personal statement and CV can be found below.

  • If you are shortlisted for an interview, we will contact two academic referees (see York’s Admissions Policy and further guidance on PGR references).
  • For shortlisting and interview stages, applicants will be scored against the following criteria and their answers to questions similar to those outlined below.

6. Prepare for your interview

If you have been shortlisted for an interview, we will notify you by the end of May 2024. Interviews will take place in June 2024. Given the short gap between shortlisting and interviews, you might want to start preparing in advance.

  • The interview panel membership is likely to consist of (but not limited to) the Director of SCIMITAR-SA, the Dean of York Graduate Research School and other senior academics from SCIMITAR-SA and/or the Department of Health Sciences, University of York. 
  • If the interview takes place in person at the University of York, we will reimburse you for reasonable travel and subsistence costs (within the UK).
  • Interviews will take place either in-person or online and will comprise:
    • A five-minute presentation on your proposal (strictly timed)
    • 25 minutes of questions from the Interview Panel.

7. The last steps

We will contact successful candidates with award offers within a week of the last interview. If successful, you will be asked to formally accept the offer within two weeks.

Potential supervisors and contact details

Research Project Proposal Guidance

Please submit your Research Project Proposal, structured by the following subheadings:

  1. Title of the proposed project: This is a working title that best describes the project at this stage. 
  2. Background: This sets out the importance of the topic. Why is this research needed? Why is it needed now? What is already known? What are the research gaps? This section should refer to the body of literature on the topic and justify your proposed project.
  3. Aims of the project: This section describes the existing research gap(s) that the proposal will address, and the objectives or research questions that the proposal will address. 
  4. Methods of research proposal: The research methods section needs to highlight what methods will be used and how, with an appropriate level of detail. In the case of quantitative research, the data set to be generated or accessed and used should be identified and the potential experimental design described. In the case of more qualitative research, again the methods should be briefly described and proposed stakeholders/populations to be interviewed/surveyed should be outlined. Proposals should also highlight ethical issues and potential limitations. 
  5. Research plan and high-level timetable of work.
  6. Resources available and required (if any).
  7. Potential impact: What are the benefits you anticipate and for whom?
  8. Limitations: Describe the potential limitations of your proposed methods and potential risks in delivering the project.
  9. Bibliography: The proposal should include correct literature citations and a brief bibliography. 

(Note that the proposal should be no more than 2000 words, excluding a bibliography, and include an approx 250-word abstract). 

Personal Statement Guidance

The personal statement should be a maximum of no more than 600 words outlining the following: 

  1. Why are you interested in your planned project? 
  2. What motivates you to pursue PhD study? 
  3. What experiences do you have which prepare you for the challenges of PhD study and the resilience it requires? 
  4. What are your career aspirations after you finish your PhD? 
  5. What contact have you had with your proposed project supervisor/s? 

Curriculum Vitae Guidance

  1. Please provide a short statement of academic interests (2-3 sentences): 
  2. Please provide details of your education:
    Name of Higher Education Institution, place and country; Degree/ qualification awarded or ongoing (with dates and classification or overall mark); Completed modules that are relevant to the application.
  3. Awards and prizes: This can include scholarships (e.g. travel or research), bursaries, prizes and honours.
  4. How have you contributed to the generation of knowledge? 
    This section can be used to explain how you have contributed to the generation of new ideas and hypotheses and which key skills you have used to develop ideas and test hypotheses. This can include research grants awarded (please give details of title, funding body, amount, dates, brief summary of the project and your role in the application and/or delivery of the project). 
    This section can also include undergraduate research projects, summer projects, or other experience obtained in the workplace etc. Please include details of:
    - project title and dates 
    - supervisor(s) 
    - short description of the type of work undertaken and the main findings.
  5. How have you contributed to the development of individuals? 
    This section can be used to highlight how you contributed to the success of a team or team members including project management, collaborative contributions, and team support. It can include your teaching activities, workshops or summer schools in which you were involved and work experience activities. 
  6. Other work experience, volunteering experience and training courses: 
    This section can include various activities you have engaged in to progress your career or the community more generally. It can be used to mention the organisation of events that have benefited your community. It can be used to describe jobs you have done and appointments to positions of responsibility such as committee membership and corporate roles. It can be used to describe activities to improve organisational or community culture (e.g. gender equality, diversity, social mobility, reward and recognition). 
  7. What skills and expertise do you bring to the post? 
    This section can be used to describe your skills and expertise that are relevant to completing a research project, for example, research skills, digital skills, interpersonal skills, transferable/professional skills and other relevant skills. 
  8. How have you communicated ideas and information? 
    This section can be used to describe academic and non-academic activities that have involved communicating with groups, teams, general audiences etc via any medium e.g.: 
    ●    This may include attendance and/or presentation at local, national or international conferences or public events. Include titles  of any oral or poster presentations. 
    ●    Contribution to peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, book chapters etc. List authors, title, journal or book title, publisher    and editors (for book chapters only), year of publication, volume and page numbers. 
    ●    Blog/Vlog articles relevant to the application. 
    ●    Reports/policy documents etc.  

Shortlisting and Interview Assessment Criteria

1. Shortlisting criteria

  3 2 1 0
The applicant is from an ODA-eligible country (for distance-learning PhD, the candidate should additionally be able to live and study in South Asia Yes     Yes
Academic record (assessed via CV) Outstanding academic record, exceeding the minimum criteria and/or demonstrating significant other relevant experience. Good academic record, exceeding the minimum criteria and/or demonstrating other relevant experience. Meets minimum admissions criteria, but no more. Information missing and/or does not meet minimum admissions criteria.
Personal statement Excellent statement, addressing all the requirements outlined in the call, and demonstrating resilience, drive, enthusiasm. It clearly articulates how the project aligns with the applicant’s previous experience and career ambitions. Good statement, addressing all the requirements outlined in the call. It may fall short of full marks on the basis of a lack of clarity in some areas. Statement to some extent addresses the requirements laid out in the call document. Where there is a lack of clarity, the meaning/intention can be divined from the information provided. Information missing and/or the statement is inadequate. It lacks information, contains contradictory statements, and/or is poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning is unclear.
Research proposal Excellent proposal, addressing all the requirements outlined in the call, demonstrating clarity of understanding of the research area, and outlining an informed and realistic proposal. Good proposal, addressing all the requirements outlined in the call. It may fall short of full marks on the basis of the clarity of understanding, and/or how informed or realistic the proposal is. Proposal to some extent addresses the requirements laid out in the call document. Where there is a lack of clarity, the meaning/intention can be divined from the information provided. Information missing and/or the statement is inadequate. It lacks information, contains contradictory statements, and/or is poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning is unclear.

 2. Presentation and Interview Criteria

  3 2 1 0
Presentation score Excellent presentation which demonstrates clear understanding of the research area and clearly articulated the applicant's proposal, while keeping to time. Good presentation which, on the whole, demonstrates understanding of the research area and/or articulated the applicant’s proposal. Time-keeping may have been an issue. Satisfactory presentation which demonstrates some understanding of the research area. It may have lacked clarity in some areas and/or suffered from significant time-keeping issues. Unsatisfactory presentation indicating the application does not understand the research area and/or needs of the project and/or was so poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning /intentions were unclear.

Example Questions (these will differ slightly on the day)

  3 2 1 0
Q1. What interests you most about the SCIMITAR-SA research programme? Excellent answer: convincing and well-structured. Good answer: generally convincing and coherent. Satisfactory answer: answers the question, but with some lack of clarity and/or incoherence. Unsatisfactory answer: failed to answer the question and/or was so poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning/intentions were unclear.
Q2. If you were awarded this scholarship, what specific research question would you address and why? Excellent answer: convincing and well-structured. Good answer: generally convincing and coherent. Satisfactory answer: answers the question, but with some lack of clarity and/or incoherence. Unsatisfactory answer: failed to answer the question and/or was so poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning/intentions were unclear.
Q3. What skills and experience do you have that would be useful for your proposed research? Skills and experience provide an excellent foundation for this PhD. Skills and experience provide a good foundation for this PhD.  Skills and experience provide a satisfactory foundation for this PhD.  Skills and experience provide an unsatisfactory foundation for this PhD and/or was so poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning/intentions were unclear.
Q4. Are there any training needs you can identify ahead of your PhD? Has an excellent understanding of the requirements of the project and gaps in their skills. Has a good understanding of the requirements of the project and gaps in their skills. Has a satisfactory understanding of the requirements of the project and gaps in their skills Has an unsatisfactory understanding of the requirements of the project and gaps in their skills and/or was so poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning/intentions were unclear.
Q5. Why do you want to study for a PhD at the University of York? Excellent answer: convincing and well-structured.  Good answer: generally convincing and coherent. Satisfactory answer: answers the question, but with some lack of clarity and/or incoherence .  Unsatisfactory answer: failed to answer the question and/or was so poorly expressed to the extent that the meaning/intentions were unclear.
Q6. Do you have any questions for us? No score.      
3. References (to be used to confirm any panel decision)
  3 2 1 0
Referee #1 Reference confirms information submitted by the applicant and demonstrates clear support of the applicant’s potential and fit with the project. Reference confirms information submitted by the applicant and demonstrates some support of the applicant’s potential and/or fit with the project. Reference demonstrates some ambivalence about the applicant’s potential and/or fit with the project, and/or contradicts some minor aspects of the information submitted by the applicant. Reference expresses a clear lack of support for the applicant’s potential and/or fit with the project and/or contradicts information submitted by the applicant.
Referee #2 Reference confirms information submitted by the applicant and demonstrates clear support of the applicant’s potential and fit with the project. Reference confirms information submitted by the applicant and demonstrates some support of the applicant’s potential and/or fit with the project. Reference demonstrates some ambivalence about the applicant’s potential and/or fit with the project, and/or contradicts some minor aspects of the information submitted by the applicant. Reference expresses a clear lack of support for the applicant’s potential and/or fit with the project and/or contradicts information submitted by the applicant.