The Rhetorics Poison: Poison, Witchcraft, and Sexual Deviance in the English Political Imagination 1615-1660
Supervisor: Professor Mark Jenner
My thesis focuses on the related imagery of poisoning, witchcraft, and sexual deviance as it appeared in media about court scandal in seventeenth-century England. It asks why such imagery co-occurs so frequently, despite taking different forms and being used by people with widely varying political goals. In doing so, it investigates the variety of poisoning and witchcraft tropes that appear in political media, paying particular attention to the ways differences in gender, age, and social rank could change the way poisoner and victim were discussed. It will argue that these differences in the way poisoning narratives were told indicates that the rhetoric of poison, witchcraft, and sexual deviance could take on much more varied meanings than previous scholarship has suggested.
My thesis draws on a wide variety of sources to show how widespread this rhetoric was. The core body of sources includes printed pamphlets, ballads, and works in the “secret history” genre and manuscript libels and polemics, all of which deal with the scandals in question. This foundation of political discourse is supplemented by works which are not directly related to contemporary political events but nonetheless serve as a valuable point of comparison to those that do. For example, with its robust tradition of imagined or semi-imagined political narrative, tragic drama is particularly useful, not least because poison, witchcraft, and sexual deviance were important tropes on stage. Similarly, crime literature offers valuable insight into the way murder and witchcraft were viewed, and court performances show some of the languages of power that the rhetoric of poison drew on.
Conference Papers
