These reports summarise fast turnaround, responsive projects on a variety of topics, using the most appropriate feasible methods, given time constraints.
Read our completed reports:
The Department of Health and Social Care commissioned The King’s Fund to undertake a scoping review of the published evidence about women’s experience of health services with a specific focus on gynaecological and urogynaecological services in primary and secondary care.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England are supporting partnerships with local housing providers and other stakeholders to develop, remodel and adapt accommodation for people with a learning disability, autism or both. This includes a substantial investment in capital grants to support housing delivery. DHSC commissioned this rapid scoping study to draw learning from the projects during their implementation, to inform future housing and accommodation interventions and to identify and share good practice.
Current systems for seeking compensation are widely considered to be costly and protracted. Costs to the NHS are rising, but it is important to note that only a small proportion of people who have suffered any form of harm while in receipt of health care choose to pursue litigation. Evidence - mainly from outside the UK - suggests that many factors can sway people’s decisions about whether or not to take legal action.
This study provides a rapid, cross-sectional, mainly qualitative exploration of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist (SCRA) use among ex-prisoners being supervised in Approved Premises (APs) and Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs). The central question underlying this research was whether the widespread use of SCRAs in prisons - which has been reported by an increasing number of studies, inspections and media articles - is spreading into the community, with consequent implications for community drug treatment. The study was also designed to explore the particular impacts of SCRA use in APs, which as supervised residential facilities, can be seen as ‘semi-carceral’ institutions, with the potential to experience similar problems to prison.
Since the 2012 King’s Fund report on this issue, the responsibility for many public health services in England, including behaviour change, has been transferred to local authorities as part of the Health and Social Care Act 2012. This has given local authorities an opportunity to reassess behaviour change in the light of their population needs, taking into account The King’s Fund’s work and other research. At the same time, many services have seen their budgets shrink in the face of recent squeezes on public health spending (Buck 2017), and this has motivated public health teams to think differently about how to deliver their services.
The King’s Fund was commissioned by the Department of Health to conduct research that would explore how and why clinical commissioning groups and local authorities chose to engage with the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector. This report first sets out the methodology we used and then presents our findings on the factors that underpin the adoption of different approaches. We discuss how commissioners’ perceptions of their own strategic role, as well as their views on what role the VCSE sector plays in the local area, appear to exert a strong influence on commissioning decisions.
Concerns about the inadequate quantity and quality in supply of home care have been reported by central government and directors of local authority social care departments, as well as managers in acute hospital settings, where access to home care packages is essential for timely discharge of older and disabled patients.
The objectives of our research, and this report, are to better understand the mechanisms of purchasing and delivery of home care, including the current state of supply and demand and key drivers of current market dynamics.
There is a wide variation in the type, amount, quality and cost of adult social care commissioned by local authorities across England.
Some of this variation can be explained by demography and geography, but for many areas, the degree of variation may reflect differences in policy and commissioning approach. This report seeks to better understand what lies behind the variation in fees paid to provide care for people aged over 65 in need of equivalent levels of support, and the role commissioning plays in determining the fee rate paid for local authority purchased care.
While there is substantial and growing digital activity in the health sector, robust evidence of its benefits to patients and clinicians, and to relieving pressure on the NHS, remains patchy. In this report, commissioned by the Office for Life Sciences, we explore whether areas of high disease burden are amenable to digital (particularly mobile health) interventions.
Read the summary: Amenability of health burdens (Summary) (PDF , 845kb)
This report draws on evidence from interviews with maternity service providers and non-NHS stakeholders and from a review of relevant literature relating to user feedback and experience. It is based on research commissioned by the Department of Health to explore the benefits of locally developed approaches to collecting and using feedback, with a particular focus on real-time feedback.
Over recent years, the UK Government has given the issue of female gentital mutilation (FGM) a high priority, both in terms of raising awareness of the illegal and harmful nature of the practice and in considering the extent of health care and other needs for women who have experienced FGM. This report provides an analysis of the current health care landscape for women with FGM as well as an estimate of the costs of treatment of FGM in England and Wales. It also provides some thoughts on data collection and tariff implications for the English NHS Payment by Results mechanism.