- Department: Social Policy and Social Work
- Module co-ordinator: Dr. Kevin Caraher
- Credit value: 20 credits
- Credit level: M
- Academic year of delivery: 2021-22
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Autumn Term 2021-22 |
By the end of this module a student should have:
Task | Length | % of module mark |
---|---|---|
Essay/coursework Assignment |
N/A | 100 |
None
Task | Length | % of module mark |
---|---|---|
Essay/coursework Assignment |
N/A | 100 |
The lead marker (the module tutor) will include comments about the content, structure, and evidence used etc. to provide you with constructive information that will enable you to improve on future work. The feedback a tutor can offer can be invaluable to your studies, so it is important you read this carefully
We aim to return your marked work to you within one month of its submission.
Feedback will be given in three ways:
(1) Comments within the actual text will highlight specific points and examples that the marker wants to draw to your attention.
(2) The marking criteria will be highlighted to show how your assignment has been rated against those criteria. This will enable you to calibrate your performance against a consistent scale, and therefore to aim to improve in specific areas.
(3) Finally the marker will provide a narrative summary in which the main points will be set out and any major areas for improvement highlighted.
Arts, W. A. and Gelissen, J. (2002) Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 137-58.
Bradshaw, J. and Finch, N. (2002) A comparison of child benefit packages in 22 countries, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report, Leeds: Corporate Document Services. No. 174, pp. 15-22. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/73510/1/Document.pdf
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism Cambridge: Polity Press. pp. 54
Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. (2006) Welfare state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: a replication and revision ‘ Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 55-72