- Department: Education
- Module co-ordinator: Dr. Volha Arkhipenka
- Credit value: 30 credits
- Credit level: I
- Academic year of delivery: 2022-23
- See module specification for other years: 2021-22
The module will explore principles of first and second language teaching and learning, as well as the nature of talk and the role it plays in teaching and learning.
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Autumn Term 2022-23 to Summer Term 2022-23 |
The module will explore principles of first and second language teaching and learning, as well as the nature of talk and the role it plays in teaching and learning. While drawing on some theoretical, methodological and policy issues, this module will have a strong practical component, aiming to develop students' understanding of needs-based learner-centred teaching in various educational contexts. It will draw on recent research into the field.
Subject content
Academic and graduate skills
The module has 22 class meetings (9 in the Autumn Term weeks 2-10; 9 in the Spring Term weeks 2-10; and 4 in the Summer Term weeks 1-4). These will involve tutor-led input lectures, small group activities, class debates, peer teaching and student presentations using a range of materials. Each class will require the students to do preparatory readings and to complete follow-up activities. Preparatory readings will take the form of academic papers, reports and related documents. Follow-up activities will include learning logs, reflective tasks and other activities.
An outline of the sessions week by week:
Autumn Term
Micro teaching
Spring Term
Summer Term
Task | Length | % of module mark |
---|---|---|
Essay/coursework Essay - 2000 words |
N/A | 40 |
Essay/coursework Essay - 3000 words |
N/A | 60 |
None
Assessment weighting:
Autumn: 40%
Spring: 60%
i. Formative; i.e. written work submitted during the module.
In the Autumn term, students will submit the outline of a lesson plan and a 500-word rationale, for formative feedback. It is assumed that it would be a topic the student would choose for their final assignment, though it need not be. The work should be submitted in Class 5 of the module for written and oral feedback to be given in Class 6. The purpose of this task is to provide the basis for constructive formative feedback on the student’s ideas, academic writing skills and critical thinking.
In Spring/ Summer, students will collect and analyse some talk data and receive feedback on their analysis. The mini-investigation will form the basis of the final summative assessment.
ii. Procedural; i.e. seminar performance.
Each student will be expected to undertake preparation for each session, and to play an active role in class tasks and group discussions. Students are expected to undertake preparatory and follow-up reading and to draw on this in class discussions, as well as any homework activities. Students will be allocated to small groups for the final micro teaching session and all students are required to take responsibility for contributing to a good outcome. Ongoing feedback will be provided on students’ participation in these activities and students will also be encouraged to give peer feedback on participation in class activities and micro teaching.
iii. Summative; i.e. final submission of written work to be assessed.
For the Autumn term assessment, students will be expected to submit a 2,000-word rationale for a lesson plan they have created (lesson plan included in an appendix, but not in the word count). The rationale will show awareness of contextual learner needs and will reflect critical understanding of theoretical, methodological and practical issues discussed in class and explored further through the students’ independent reading. There will be opportunities to discuss the requirements for this submission throughout the term and students will be able to use the formative feedback given on the mid-term task when preparing their end-of-term summative assessment. It is essential that students engage with reading and activities for all weeks of the module in order to write a good assignment.
For Spring/ Summer, students will submit a 3,000-word report and analysis of the data they collected for the formative task. Essays should display relevant knowledge of the theoretical and practical implications of the role of talk in classroom learning.
Task | Length | % of module mark |
---|---|---|
Essay/coursework Essay - 2000 words |
N/A | 40 |
Essay/coursework Essay - 3000 words |
N/A | 60 |
Written feedback on assignment report sheet and face-to- face feedback in supervisions.The feedback is returned to students in line with university policy. Please check the Guide to Assessment, Standards, Marking and Feedback for more information.
Indicative readings for Autumn term
Brown, H. D. (2006). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). London: Pearson.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). London: Longman.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teachers guide (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan Education.
Woodward, T. (2001). Planning lessons and courses: Designing sequences of work for the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Indicative readings for Spring/ Summer term
Hardman, F. (2008). The guided co-construction of knowledge. In M. Martin-Jones, A. de Mejia & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education (pp. 253-264). New York: Springer Publishing.
Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70-86.
Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and education, 22(3), 222-240.
Mercer, N. & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural theory in second language education. Multilingual Matters.