To be eligible for submission to REF 2021, the outputs specified below must be deposited in an open access repository:
The following deposit requirements apply:
Deposit now and be REF ready
To ensure that your articles are eligible for REF 2021, deposit your author accepted manuscript into PURE within the appropriate timescale. See the step-by-step guide to deposit your research or login to PURE now.
The requirement to comply with the policy only applies to particular outputs as described under Key criteria above.
HEFCE's FAQ 2.4 (updated August 2016) provides additional guidance on conference proceedings and journals with only an ISBN:
This policy does not affect the following which will still be eligible for submission to REF:
The REF policy does, however, suggest that credit will be given in the research environment component of REF 2021 where a HEI can demonstrate that it has taken steps towards enabling open access for outputs outside scope.
Note: The University's own Policy on the Publication of Research also makes requirements in terms of the deposit of published research outputs.
The HEFCE FAQs on deposit on acceptance define the date of acceptance as the point at which the author is notified that:
By date of acceptance, the paper should have been updated to include all changes resulting from peer review as well as any changes of an academic nature requested by the journal editor or conference organiser. At this stage, the journal editor or conference organiser normally notifies the author that their paper has been ‘firmly’ accepted (as opposed to any earlier point of ‘provisional’ acceptance e.g. conditional on major or minor revisions being made) and the paper is ready for copy-editing or typesetting; it is the date of this notification that should be taken to mean the date of acceptance.
See also Version for deposit.
The complete date of acceptance must be recorded, including year, month and day. For guidance on how to do this within PURE see Deposit your research.
The HECFE policy defines date of publication as the earliest date that the final version-of-record is made available on the publisher's website. This generally means that the "early online" date, rather than the print publication date, should be taken as the date of publication.
It is important that the correct version of a manuscript is deposited in PURE. This is normally the accepted manuscript as described below. This may be augmented with an updated peer-reviewed manuscript.
Most publishers will not allow the final published version to be deposited (see Journal policies and Article versions for more information). If, however, this is permitted and is available within the required timeframe, then the final published version may be deposited instead of, or in addition to, the accepted manuscript.
It is the author's accepted and final peer-reviewed text, otherwise known as "accepted manuscript", "accepted author manuscript", "author accepted manuscript" (AAM), "final author version" or "post-print" that is normally required for deposit into PURE.
The HEFCE FAQs on deposit on acceptance illustrate the versions of manuscripts using the following diagram:
The author's final, accepted manuscript is the one that has been agreed with the editor at point of acceptance.
The accepted manuscript is not the same as the copy-edited, typeset or published paper – these versions are known as 'proofs' or 'versions of record' and publishers do not normally allow authors to make these open-access.
Accepted manuscripts do not typically contain the subsequent non-academic alterations arising from copyediting and typesetting, nor do they typically show the journal page numbers and other publication livery (eg publisher's logo) present in the published version of record. For many people wishing to access research findings, however, accepted manuscripts do represent an academically sound version of the output.
The policy allows the augmentation of the author accepted manuscript by what HEFCE have termed an "updated peer-reviewed manuscript". For example, authors may make minor changes to the manuscript following acceptance (possibly as a result of copy-editing, as figures become finalised, or as rights to third-party material become secured). These changes, however, should not result from peer review.
This means that in some cases authors may add an updated manuscript to PURE. Please note that the original accepted manuscript version should not be removed from the PURE record as this will be associated with the recorded date of deposit.
In cases where it is not possible to meet the open access requirements, the REF open access policy allows for a number of exceptions.
The REF policy lists a number of reasons why an exception may be granted, including reasons why an output could not be deposited to a repository at all, reasons why the output could not be made available as open access through the repository, or technical issues which prevented the output form meeting the requirements.
The following exceptions deal with cases where the output was unable to meet the deposit requirements or where the output is made open access via another route.
The following exceptions apply where deposit is possible but the access requirements cannot be met. Access exceptions to the policy apply where:
*Embargo periods should not exceed the following maxima:
- 12 months for REF Main Panel A and REF Main Panel B
- 24 months for REF Main Panel C and REF Main Panel D
Interdisciplinary research being submitted to Main Panel A or B that would also be admissible to Main Panel C or D may respect the longer of the two embargo periods.
See Journal policies for more information on embargo periods and related tools.
Note: In these cases, deposit should still be made into PURE. Library staff will ensure that the deposit will remain "closed" until open access requirements can be met.
The following exceptions deal with cases where an output was not able to meet the criteria due to a technical issue:
Note: In these cases, the expectation is that the criteria are met retroactivity as soon as possible, for example, by deposit into PURE.
In very exceptional cases, it may not be possible for an output to meet the requirements for a reason not covered by the exceptions above (41). A short written explanation will be required.
The exceptions procedure at York is academic-led. Chairs of Departmental Research Committees will approve exceptions within their departments with final sign-off from the appropriate Associate Dean (Research). An audit log of evidence to support exceptions is maintained. Oversight of this log is undertaken by the Research Strategy and Policy Office. Exceptions are recorded in PURE by Library staff following sign-off.
In some cases, exceptions will automatically be recorded by the Library and it is not necessary for any of the output’s authors to request an exception. This will be the case where:
In all other cases where an output is within the scope of the REF open access requirements but does not meet them the authors of the output should request an exception, following the steps below, as soon as possible once they become aware that an exception may be required.
1. For each output only one exception request should be submitted. For multiple-authored outputs, agreement should be reached between internal authors as to which author should submit the request.
2. Make sure the output has been recorded in PURE, and that the full date of acceptance (year, month, and day) has been recorded on the PURE record. Take a note of the PURE Id for the relevant record (this will be a numerical identifier shown at the top-left of the PURE record).
Please do not use the REF2020 exception field in PURE to record exceptions. This will be completed for you by Library staff once the exceptions has been approved.
4. Open the online REF Open Access Exception Request Form and add your details and the details of the output (including the PURE Id).
5. In the Details section request form, use the drop-down list to indicate the exception that you consider applies to the output. This indication may be overridden by the Chair of Departmental Research Committee at a later stage.
6. Provide a full descriptive explanation for the circumstances leading to the exception request. Confidential information should not be submitted via the request form.
The Chair of Departmental Research Committee will be asked to approve the request and will contact you if they need any further details.
Approved requests will be signed off by the relevant Associate Dean for Research.
Please contact the Research Strategy and Policy Office if you have any queries relating to the REF.