Industrious gentlemen and the moral material of individual knowledge in seventeenth-century England
Supervisors: Sophie Weeks and Mark Jenner
My research focuses on Francis Bacon’s (1561–1626) prescriptions for the individual cultivation of moral virtue pertaining to his project for the reform of natural philosophy. The overarching historiographical thrust of my analysis holds that Bacon’s philosophy is unique in its objective diagnosis of the human animal as an intrinsically flawed instrument of methodology which, if not properly conditioned, is destructive to the integrity of natural enquiry.
In Bacon’s view, it is only through the self-disciplined, independent husbandry of moral virtue that the enquirer’s sensorium is able to subdue the inimical forces of the intellect and thereby effect an unobstructed interpretive – and manipulative – relationship with nature. Natural enquiry and its purpose, which is to harness nature to the end of human utility and beneficence, must proceed as an individual exercise of the native human capacity for moral discipline.
My thesis argues against claims that Bacon’s provisions sought to disqualify the solitary practitioner in deference to the methodological and epistemic authority of collective assessment. Within the context of moral virtue as a foundation of operative natural enquiry, my analysis follows the initial posthumous progress of Bacon’s natural and experimental philosophy as it influenced such figures as Samuel Hartlib and Robert Boyle in the 1630s and 1640s.
Graduate Teaching Assistant for the module 'Knowledge and Beliefs in World History' (Autumn terms 2021 and 2022).