About
This is the second
conference of the international research network Enchanted Modernities: Theosophy, Modernism and the Arts,
c.1875-1960 funded by the
Leverhulme Trust. The Network’s first conference, ‘Enchanted Modernities: Theosophy
and the Arts in the Modern World’ held at the University of Amsterdam in 2013, mapped
Theosophy’s varied influence on painting, sculpture, applied and
decorative arts, music, architecture and other art forms in the period
c.1875-1960. It focused on the translation of Theosophical ideas, especially
those of key figures in the Theosophical Society in this period, such as Helena
Petrovna Blavatsky and Annie Besant, into material, visual, and audible form.
Theosophy
was, without question, a major source of inspiration and influence for artists
in the modern age. Our second conference, to be held at Columbia University on
October 9–10 (Friday-Saturday), 2015, seeks to locate that influence within its
cultural contexts and to trace the textual practices and philosophical,
historical, and cultural traditions that produced and sustained Theosophy. This
conference also seeks to explore the wider contexts of Theosophy’s influence in
the arts. How can we locate Theosophical arts within broader cultural and
social histories of the period c.1875-1960? Interest in Theosophical ideas was
often far more than an aesthetic inclination. For many, Theosophy was useful
precisely because it gave social and political purpose to the arts. Beyond
these conscious commitments, how might we go about understanding the historical
specificities of Theosophical arts? For example, how might we understand these
arts in relation to class, gender and race, to momentous historical events such
as the First World War, to geopolitics, or to the local politics of place?
In the first place, the writings
of Blavatsky, Besant and other thinkers influenced by Theosophy are worthy of
attention in their own right. How should we read these texts as contributions
to modern (re)enchantment? How did these writings come to influence artists and
thinkers in such a wide variety of fields, and what was the nature of that
influence? Secondly, we should account for the textual life of Theosophy beyond
its official publications: writers of fiction and poetry were influenced by
Theosophical ideas, and artistic figures of all kinds produced their own texts,
such as manifestos, which extended the textual reach of Theosophical
enchantment. In addition, we might ask how Theosophical ideas made the
transition between elite and popular forms of writing, for example, to genres
such as science fiction and fantasy, and what this might tell us about the
location of esoteric thought in modern culture. Thirdly, we should note the
rapidly expanding social movements influenced by Theosophical writings, such as
vegetarianism and animal anti-vivisection. How did these movements shape life
practices and bring about cultural transformations? Finally, we also invite reflection on the
entanglement between Theosophy and the arts on the one hand and science,
technology and medicine on the other. The period c.1875-1960 was one of momentous
change not only in the arts, but also in the sciences: how might we trace the
connections between artistic and scientific practice which formed in relation
to Theosophy and related movements?
