CONCERNING GAMES, WAGERS & LOTTERIES

Games and Wagers have been lawful, provided that they would be moderate,
& they would be made from honorable matters, & the one side
would be equal to the other, i.e. the risk of losing and the hope of
gaining on both sides would have a proportion to the event, about which
there is contention; e.g. in a game which on the dexterity of the body
or nature is fixed, if the dexterity of one will have exceeded the
dexterity of the other by twice as much, there is equality, when here
also he <the other> would put down the double premium; or if
there should be ten, of whom one at a time they would set down a gold
coin, and also they would compete with this agreement, so that he who
will have thrown the most, he would carry off all <of the ten>,
indeed it may seem unfair, when he who experienced a risk of only one
gold coin, may gain nine, but at the same time it must be considered,
here the risk of losing is nine-fold greater, than the hope of winning.
Pufendorf. . *de I. N. & G. l. 5. c. 9. § 7*
Hence it is evident how in this matter the Art of Conjecture would be
necessary, for when the conditions of those gaming or competing would
be able to vary completely & to be subject to innumerable cases, on
that account no one without the assistance of this Art will have been
able to discover easily the number of cases, which would favor or
oppose this or that fellow gambler or guarantor of the wager, and
thereupon to determine, whether each of the two equally must be
determined in the condition of winning & losing, or not. Because in
order that more be revealed, we shall mention an example in wagers, for
in what manner in a game the lots or the expectations of
fellow-gamblers would be able to be defined, copiously Huygens in the
unique pamphlet *On a system for playing dice*, & my famous
Uncle in the entire third part of his *Tractate on the Art of
Conjecture* have revealed.

Quite famous today are those Wagers of the Genoise, which are established publicly on the occasion of the elections, which happen in the individual years in Genoa, when five out of one hundred Senators are selected by lot, who in this year discharge the more principal offices; therefore then the wealthy merchants are accustomed at this certain time, before the decision by a lottery would occur, to enter upon a contest with others in this law, in order that whoever will have been willing to compete, he may set out a token for as much as he wishes, & it would name five of these one hundred <Senators>, & if afterwards the lottery will have produced, that one of the named will have been elected, he would be about to receive a certain sum of money, upon which it has been agreed; if two will have been elected, a greater <sum>; if three, an even greater <sum>; if four, again a greater <sum>; if five, again a greater <sum>; if indeed none of the nominated will have been elected, he would make an expense of the losing token; it is sought, for how much the prize in each chance ought to be established, in order that an equality would be strived for in the lots?

Let the token or price to be expended =*a*, the prize has been
established or rather must be established, if one of the nominated is
selected =*t*, if two =*u*, if three =*x*, if four
=*y*, if five =*z*; now for the sake of brevity the number of
cases or of lots would be set, in which five are being selected
=*b*, in which four =*c*, in which three =*d*, in which
two =*e*, in which one =*f*, in which none =*g*.
Therefore there are *b* cases with the result that someone would
acquire *z*, *c* cases that *y*, *d* cases that
*x*, *e* cases that *u*, *f* cases that *t*
& *g* that none, and for that reason the expectation will be
worth

which ought to be equal to the price paid *a*, whence the equation
will be held as *bz* + *cy* + *dx* + *eu* +
*ft* = *ba* + *ca* + *da* + *ea* + *fa* +
*ga* therefore with the problem it would be indeterminate, indeed
four are able to be chosen at will, certainly because there is a
combination in the nature of the thing, as the prizes are reciprocally
proportional to the number of chances, i. e. for which reason as the
chances are fewer, those prizes would be presented as more prized,
hence in the place of *z*, *y*, &c. we place a single
unknown only, with the remaining existing having been made
proportionate to that one *bz/c*, *bc/d*, *bz/e*,
*bz/f* &, whence the equation would be of such kind

or or (if for the number of all the cases
*b* + *c* + *d* + *e* + *f* + *g* let
*h* be put)

& finally

If now there is a token which ought to be set down or would be one gold
coin, & for the letters *b*, *c*, *d*, &c. the
values or themselves would be substituted, these which are found by
means of the noted combination rAules, indeed

*b* = 1,
*c* = (5.4.3.2)/(1.2.3.4) x 95/1 = 475,
*d* = (5.4.3)/(1.2.3) x (95.94)/(1.2) = 44650,

*e* = (5.4)/(1.2) x (95.94.93)/(1.2.3) = 1384150,
*g* = (95.94.93.92.91)/(1.2.3.4.5) = 57940519,
*h* = the sum of the preceeding numbers

= (100.99.98.97.96)/(1.2.3.4.5) =
75287520, the prizes are found *z* =
150574 gold.

*y* = 31700^{4}/_{475} gold,
*x* = 337^{6227}/_{22325} gold,
*u* = 10^{608002}/_{692075} gold,
*t* = ^{15057504}/_{15917725} of one gold coin.

Hence it is evident how much the Genoise merchants would engage in fraud, while for one gold coin regularly they promise only 10, 000 gold coins, if five, 1500. if four, 300 if three, 10 if two, & one if one of the named will have been elected, for granted that in this last case those, who contend with the merchants in the way named, would have something of a profit, nevertheless by much more there is a loss, which they suffer by the remaining four chances, which clearly is evident, if we should seek the expectation ourselves, but that is

= 43876725/75287520 = 2925115/5019168

of the one gold coin, but they ought to expect so much, as much as they have set down, i. e. one gold coin, therefore the Genoise dealers defraud the individual gamblers the 2094053/5019168 parts of one gold coin, from which it is appropriate, not least a Ministry is able to permit such gambling, seeing that <it is> completely unjust, by public authority, & the merchants are held to the restitution of it, which they have received as more than just.

Indeed unjust are these Genoise wagers, which Juan Caramuel^{1}
calls by the proper name *Concertationes Cosmopolitanas*, also he
asserts in *Mathesi Nova, syntagm. 7* but nevertheless the prizes,
which he assigned to the single cases, still in truth fall short,
moreover his errors & paralogisms, which here and there he commits
in the expectations to be defined of the players, it would be
excessively obliging to show in this.

We would add rather something about the Jars of Fortune of Lotteries,
thus in the words of the Belgian voice *Loten*, Latin *sortiri*,
of which the use today is most frequent. But the jar of fortune is set up
in this way: With a certain number of tickets having been
thrown down into an urn, of inscribed and of empty <tickets>, a
chance is returned for the price of removing the same, thus so that this
one extracting would receive, what the inscription of those exhibits on
themselves; it is demanded for the justice of it, that the value of all
the tickets chosen successively would not greatly exceed the value of
the things having been set out there: for because also the costs must
be made, & such jars are generally used towards the collection of
money to be expended upon public works, or also the alleviation of
others in need, on that account from exact equality a portion is held
back, to such an extent so that such a difference, by which commonly the
value of all the tickets together exceeds the prizes having been put
forth, would have a reason of a certain voluntary tax, or of the alms
having been enticed in a merry way, as well the esteemed Pufendorf speaks
*loc. supra cit.*

Such a jar of fortune, being composed out of pure annuities, not long ago in Belgium has been defined under the fairest conditions, of which we have a description in the New Laws of Bern, in which on the date Amsterdam 15 March 1709 these words are held as having been written in the French language:

"Here is the plan of the Lottery of the Life Annuity Pensions, that one proposes to make in this Country, & which has been sent to the Cities, in order to have their approbation. There are 8000 gold Tickets at 250 Florins each, that which amounts to 2000000. Of these 8000 Tickets there are 1300 Black or Prize & 6700 White. These latter will carry 6% interest during life. This interest, just as the prize, will be exempt from the 100th & 200th tax & all other Charges. The Prize will be shared in the following manner. Two Lots at 3000 Florins of Pension each, making 6000. Four Lots at 2000 fl. of P. making 8000. Four L. at 1000 fl. of P. making 4000. Eight L. at 500 fl. of P. making 4000. Fourteen L. at 250 fl. of P. making 3500. Thirty L. at 150 fl. of P. making 4500. Thirty L. at 100 fl. of P making 3000. Twelve hundred eight L. at 30 fl. of P. making 36240. This which makes 1300 Lots & 69240 fl. of Life Annuity Pensions. The 6700 White Tickets at 6% produce 100500 florins of Life Annuity Pensions. The first and last Ticket each of 150 florins of Life Annuity Pensions. That which returns at 8000 Tickets of 250 florins each, making 2000000 of Florins in fund or Principal, producing per year 170040 Florins of Life Annuity Pensions. Those, who will wish to convert their Life Annuity Pensions into obligations at 4% on the State, will be able to make in all or in part, of the kind that the Prize of 3000 Florins of Life Annuity Pensions can be changed into the sum of 35250 fl. & the other prizes in proportion. One relates to draw this Lottery on 1 May next, & 6 weeks after one will be obliged to give the names of those, who one wishes to place in the letters of the Life Annuity Pensions. One will be able to put on many Heads, but no less than 100 florins of pension on each."

From these words it is clear, that the value of all the tickets taken
together is 2, 000, 000 florins, according to which in the individual
years 170, 040 florins are paid in the annuities, but because someone,
if he wishes, is able to change annuities into redeemables, with the
result that for the return of 3, 000 florins he would receive a lot of
35, 250 florins, & from this sum in the individual years I put 4%
interest, i. e. 1410 florins, and also to such an extent the annuity of
3000 florins would be estimated to be worth just as much as 35250
florins, therefore 170, 040 florins yearly will be worth just as much as
1, 997, 970 florins however much therefore the value of all the tickets
<will be worth> the value of all the payments taken together, that
is 1, 997, 970 florins, it would exceed by 2030 florins, & the
annuity of one florin yearly would be put to be worth
11_{4} florins (for it is
3000:35250::1.11_{4}) when the value of it, as we
found above in *Chapter 4 *at most would be in the ratio of one to
10^{600}/_{1000} or 10^{3}/_{5},
abundantly however such a difference is balanced with this
interest, evidently seeing that such annuities would be exempt from the
tax of 1% or 2% coin, and from other taxes; add that, if in. where for
the interest we have set down 5%, the annuities would *d. cap. 4
*have been computed on the standard of interest of 3 or 4% (as this
ought to happen) a richer premium would have been produced than for 1
whence it is clear, how much more popular this lottery would be, than
the others which commonly are accustomed to be established, where one
who brings forth a white or blank ticket, entirely because he exposed
silver, one certainly <who brings forth> a black <ticket>,
regularly loses a tenth part of his ticket, since in this lottery that
man, who draws an empty ticket, would have in single years 6%, this is,
for 250 Dutch florins or 100 Imperial thalers, six Imperials, which if
they should be multiplied by 11^{3}/_{4} are
discovered to be worth 70^{1/2 Imperials,
accordingly this man, who extracts a white ticket, out of 100
Imperials, for which he has purchased the ticket, loses nonetheless
291/2 Imperials.
1 Juan Caramuel 1606-1682. was a Cistercian and author of some
seventy works. He is most famous for the work Mathesis biceps: Vetus
et nova [Two-headed mathematics: old and new]. Bernoulli, in a
letter to Montmort (p. 387), mentions Caramuel. "A Jesuit named
Caramuel, who I mentioned in my Thesis, wished to push these matters,
and even criticize M. Huygens in the Treatise that he names KYBEIA
[Dicing], and what he has inferred in his great Works of Mathematics;
but as all this that he gives is only a heap of faulty reasonings, I
reckon it as nothing."
}